As stated previously Becka and I are very aware of how the Photoshop software works therefore we were put at an advantage when we were creating our magazine cover and film poster. Having existing knowledge of the software meant that we could combine our skills and create more developed and professional looking images.
Wednesday, 26 March 2014
Promotional Package
Successful movies rely on promotional
packages, solely because they essentially promote the film creating greater
success. Promotional packages act as the advertisement to attract the audience
into wanting to see the film; if they advertise the film properly it ensures
that the correct target audience they have originally aimed to cater for is
enticed by each media product. Promotional packages consist of things like;
magazine covers, posters and other media products that ultimately promote the
main media product (such as a trailer).
Becka and I have both created a promotional
package to accompany our film trailer; the increased advertising will
ultimately promote our film trailer so it has become an essential process to
create the other 2 media products. Promotional packages can be shown through
different visual stimulus; this means that the same media product is often
present in various ways, for instance: trailers are shown on the television at
various times of the day on various channels; they are also shown at the
cinemas and easily accessible on the internet. TV and internet sources are
always beneficial to use because they ensure that a wide audience access the
material that’s been produced, they are also the two main sources that people
use which suggests more and more individuals will view the certain product.
Becka and I ensured that all of our
media products that acted as the promotional package interlinked and were consistent,
by using characters that feature in our trailer on our poster and magazine
cover it suggested the main character roles within the film; it also gave a
suggestion to the narrative and content of the film.
The aim of our promotional packages was
to slightly reveal the narrative of the film without giving away too much; we
also wanted to expose the genre of the film to our audience so that they had a
pre-conceived idea of what to expect. I always view thriller films as the most
spine-chilling and exciting therefore revealing this was a tactic that would hopefully
excite a broadened audience.
Final poster
Final magazine cover
Final poster
Final magazine cover
Magazine development
We wanted completely diverse images for our magazine cover and film poster, we had partook in a photo shoot so that we had a wide variety of different images that could fit in both media products. Becka and I agreed upon the image above, however experienced problems when fitting it in to our magazine cover as the image wasn't large enough to fit the whole page. The alternative method to solve the situation was to use images that were quite similar as these were more portrait and offered a longer image that could appropriately fit in both portrait magazine cover and film poster. This image would have been more effective if the photographer (Becka) had taken the image using a portrait shot ensuring my head fitted within the image, as the image cut the top of my head out it would have been impossible for it to look professional because viewers would see that the top of my head is literally missing. Once we had allocated the image onto our magazine cover it was evident that it would not work, however to ensure that people who were in our targeted audience agreed or disagreed with us we had asked them what they thought of the image on the magazine cover. Luckily they agreed with what we had said, asking for feedback deemed very beneficial as it gave us an in sight on what people who we wished to cater our product to had thought about our magazine cover. As we want to sell this product to people within our target audience we have to use material that they'd be engaged by, many agreed that the image was being engaging and interesting however as it was taken from a close up angle there would be gaps.
From primary research I understood that many magazines allow close up shots on the front image for their magazine but I feel they have a greater use of either mid-shots or long shots of the starring character. With this said it was evident that we needed a different image for our magazine cover, being a vital source for promotion we wanted an image that would add mystery and excitement to the film without giving away too much suggestions on the narrative.
Working with iMovie
I don't find iMovie particularly hard, I've used it in both AS and A2 projects because I find it relatively simpler than using Final Cut Express, I feel iMovie offers me more options than Final Cut and therefore creates a better outcome.
iMovie allows me to add in my own transitions, sounds, cut scenes, pace, etc. and therefore benefits me greatly. I feel it's my product look more professional, I want my project to be much better than my AS product therefore different tools need to be included to create a better outcome. Having the experience in the programme made me more confident with using iMovie, if I hadn't have used it previously it would mean I needed to develop the skills, as I already have them I can enhance my skills further.
I believe my project will be more successful and professional using iMovie, even peers have asked for advice on how to use the programme because I have developed a good knowledge on how things work on this particular programme.
Some would suggest using iMovie to be very basic and a 'cop out' however I do not believe the same, I don't feel Final Cut would offer me the same tools I would need to produce a trailer like the one I already have. Final Cut is obviously more advanced in the sense that it offers more professional and precise tools, this would obviously suggest a better outcome however because of my inexperience and instant disliking last year, as the editor I avoided using Final Cut. I feel it would develop a music video better than a film trailer because the programme, if used correctly, is able to eliminate backgrounds and provide lip-syncing easier. I believe the naming of the programme iMovie gives a pre-conception of being a more beneficial programme for developing films, this is what lured me in during my AS project.
Before completing my A2 project I was determined to develop my skills and overall media products by using the more advanced, Final Cut Express, never-the-less I feel that it didn't offer the tools I already grew fond of that were readily available on trusting programme iMovie, tools such as; transitions and background effects.
Having readily available tools that I was already aware of and experienced with instantly put my at a slight advantage into the completion of my media product as it meant I didn't have to spend additional time learning a new software/programme that was quite difficult and wasn't always reliable due saving re-writes and problems other peers in my class had experienced. The only time I've found Final Cut to be beneficial was when developing and editing a music video as a preliminary task as I was able to eliminate the green screen into a gif from the internet, paired with a real music song that lip-synced perfectly. The advanced tools weren't necessary in the production of the film trailer, I didn't need to eliminate any backgrounds from the shots Becka and I had filmed as that is what created the perfect mise-en-scene to fit in with thriller genre conventions. The tools that I found I needed were all found in iMovie, I had a pre-conceived idea of how I wanted to adapt and improve the original filming and found iMovie to successfully fit the expectation.
Overall I believe that our media film trailer has benefited greatly from using iMovie, it's impacted the trailer into creating something that originally looked very mediocre and home-made into something of higher professionalism.
The tools I've used within iMovie were as follows:
Transitions; which effectively dissolved each scene into another, this made the trailer flow as each went into the other, this was very effective and meant we had followed the conventions of the high majority of thriller trailers.
Effects: this allowed me to literally add an effect over the entire filmed scenes included in the film trailer I've produced, this enabled different accessible effects that made each of my scenes fit the narrative of the film. Luckily there was an effect that created an 'old time' look over the shot, as half of our trailer is supposed to look like it's in the past (90's) this effect was brilliant and ensured the viewers were able to understand that some parts were set in the past.
iMovie allows me to add in my own transitions, sounds, cut scenes, pace, etc. and therefore benefits me greatly. I feel it's my product look more professional, I want my project to be much better than my AS product therefore different tools need to be included to create a better outcome. Having the experience in the programme made me more confident with using iMovie, if I hadn't have used it previously it would mean I needed to develop the skills, as I already have them I can enhance my skills further.
I believe my project will be more successful and professional using iMovie, even peers have asked for advice on how to use the programme because I have developed a good knowledge on how things work on this particular programme.
Some would suggest using iMovie to be very basic and a 'cop out' however I do not believe the same, I don't feel Final Cut would offer me the same tools I would need to produce a trailer like the one I already have. Final Cut is obviously more advanced in the sense that it offers more professional and precise tools, this would obviously suggest a better outcome however because of my inexperience and instant disliking last year, as the editor I avoided using Final Cut. I feel it would develop a music video better than a film trailer because the programme, if used correctly, is able to eliminate backgrounds and provide lip-syncing easier. I believe the naming of the programme iMovie gives a pre-conception of being a more beneficial programme for developing films, this is what lured me in during my AS project.
Before completing my A2 project I was determined to develop my skills and overall media products by using the more advanced, Final Cut Express, never-the-less I feel that it didn't offer the tools I already grew fond of that were readily available on trusting programme iMovie, tools such as; transitions and background effects.
Having readily available tools that I was already aware of and experienced with instantly put my at a slight advantage into the completion of my media product as it meant I didn't have to spend additional time learning a new software/programme that was quite difficult and wasn't always reliable due saving re-writes and problems other peers in my class had experienced. The only time I've found Final Cut to be beneficial was when developing and editing a music video as a preliminary task as I was able to eliminate the green screen into a gif from the internet, paired with a real music song that lip-synced perfectly. The advanced tools weren't necessary in the production of the film trailer, I didn't need to eliminate any backgrounds from the shots Becka and I had filmed as that is what created the perfect mise-en-scene to fit in with thriller genre conventions. The tools that I found I needed were all found in iMovie, I had a pre-conceived idea of how I wanted to adapt and improve the original filming and found iMovie to successfully fit the expectation.
Overall I believe that our media film trailer has benefited greatly from using iMovie, it's impacted the trailer into creating something that originally looked very mediocre and home-made into something of higher professionalism.
The tools I've used within iMovie were as follows:
Transitions; which effectively dissolved each scene into another, this made the trailer flow as each went into the other, this was very effective and meant we had followed the conventions of the high majority of thriller trailers.
Effects: this allowed me to literally add an effect over the entire filmed scenes included in the film trailer I've produced, this enabled different accessible effects that made each of my scenes fit the narrative of the film. Luckily there was an effect that created an 'old time' look over the shot, as half of our trailer is supposed to look like it's in the past (90's) this effect was brilliant and ensured the viewers were able to understand that some parts were set in the past.
Movie Production Logos
Production logos are visual information
that is included in every film that’s been produced; some actually suggest the
type of film that is yet to come as many movie productions cater for one type
of film, whether that’s Pixar for Disney films or Lionsgate which is a
multi-film organisation. Lionsgate is a production logo which is highly
recognised because of how many successful films the company associate with,
Becka and I found it an essential process to research upon what logo we should
use to promote our film. As stated previously I feel that production logos
often suggest what category or genre the film fits into as many only associate
themselves with only a select few genres of film, this would provide a clear
indication of what the viewers should expect with the following film. From completing
my AS media course I have learned and became aware that specific production
logos only associated with particular genres, in my AS project the production
logo Becka and I decided to use was Paramount
Vantage which I believe is a logo that is generally seen on thriller
movies, although this was an option I felt
it was necessary to change the production logo because it would show our
developed knowledge and show that we’ve took our time to research into greater
logos that feature on a thriller genre; we decided upon New Line Cinema simply because of the recognition and popularity of
the production, it also had a great association in supporting thriller films. There
was a wide variety that we could have chosen from as they all featured on
thriller films however we could only choose one and New Line Cinema seemed most appropriate. Reviewing already
established films helped us to come to our decision on what production logo we
should use, we took a lot of time to review films that had the same genre as
ours to give us a clear indication of what production we should be using. We looked
directly at trailers such as; Final
Destination, Night Mare on Elm Street, The Lovely Bones and Prisoners and
most of the previous selection featured New
Line Cinema so it was obvious that this was the production that would fit
our trailer best. If successful films had already used this production logo and
had resemblance to our genre then it made sense to follow the same production
logo. As it’s also such a well known ‘brand’ it may suggest that the film has
greater professionalism and quality because it has the same logo as successful
films.
Tuesday, 25 March 2014
Wednesday, 12 March 2014
Roles
Past experience has proved that Becka
and I work well as a team, from studying AS media together and creating a film
opening we’d learned that we were successful as a team. Becka and I worked
together to create a film trailer, film poster and a film magazine, all media
products would have a large workload and therefore the effort and participation
needed to be equally shared, because of this we had set roles that both of us
would fulfil. Being in a group with only 2 members has its benefits and meant
that Becka and I was able to share, combine and exchange ideas and skills in
order to achieve the most successful outcome.
We take very similar subjects however Becka
benefits greater from taking A-level English, this meant she was effectively
able to generate suggestions on what the script should consist of, this skill
guided us through creating a successful narrative for our film trailer as she
was able to express ideas that we should include and list why they’d have a
greater impact and reaction from our audience.
Becka and I are both moderately skilled
in Photoshop as we both study this subject as a part of our A-levels, from
day-to-day experience it means that we have a greater knowledge on how the
programme works and overall would generate a better image to fit on our
magazine, poster and billing block. I believe Photoshop can make an ordinary
image look much more professional than any internet editor would, having the
experience and skill in the programme put Becka and I at an advantage because
we were able to enhance the image, overlay items and essentially create all
three media products effectively. I had decided to take the role of creating
the billing block and magazine cover, whilst Becka contributed and successfully
made the film poster, by sharing the workload it enabled us to create the
products with ease without consuming too much time, however even though we had
our set roles we’d still help each other complete each product by tampering
with the Photoshop tools or giving feedback, this allowed us to progress our
knowledge and improve our overall product. Assigning different roles was
beneficial as it meant our products were completed in a shorter amount of time,
and once they were completed we could either adapt them further after receiving
feedback or work on something else.
Creating the billing block wasn’t as
stressful as I thought it would be, by reviewing internet sources I was able to
find a template which suited our film and that actually looked professional; I feel
I’ve effectively produced a good billing block.
I had to volunteer to be the main
actress of the film trailer because the original casting member was unable to
do so; this gave Becka the immediate opportunity to get involved with the
filming meaning she had a major job to capture good and effective shots for our
film trailer. I believe Becka did a good job in capturing different angles and
shots in order to create an engaging and interesting trailer, we needed to
ensure the camera angles were in focus for greater professionalism, ensuring
that each character was within the shot without the cutting heads or vital
props or mise-en-scene out. I partook in some of the filming, the scenes where I
wasn’t present (such as the park scene) is where I had filmed as I wanted to
share the workload with fellow team member, Becka. When looking back onto the
filming produce Becka and I didn’t film to the best of our ability on many of
the shots taken, luckily we took plenty of different shots and had redone
scenes multiple times. Several shots and scenes weren’t framed properly so
parts were cut off however we re framed from using the shots that weren’t worthy,
in order to redress the error we had made we should have re-filmed some shots,
but we had left this too late when we were unable to use the same actors and
actresses in good timing.
Filming the trailer was one of the most
important tasks that needed to be completed; a lot of successful shots were
captured however there was also a lot of scenes that could have been improved
if we’d had taken multiple days with more time to get them. The more use of the
camera the more familiarity with the tools, also a lot more retakes could have
been shot, an example of a shot that didn’t fit the frame but still exists in
our trailer is the one of the youngest actress on the rocking object; when
filming I should have followed her movement, instead the top of her head cuts
from the shot. This didn’t do us justice because the framing was off key, our
trailer would have looked more professional if I’d have followed the movement
instead of keeping the camera still.
The editing of the film was my job, I decided
to take on this role because of the experienced I’d gained from last year’s
project that I’d constructed together, using iMovie. I was a lot quicker to
make adjustments to the shots and trailer for this reason and it consumed less
time if I was becoming more familiar with the software. Last year I
really come to grips with the advanced software, especially iMovie, so this
year I felt I could push my knowledge and experiment with new and developed
tools.
We used iMovie to construct and combine our trailer, although it is the most simple
editing programme compared to Final Cut I found it a lot simpler to use because
of the advanced knowledge I’d regained, it also gave me greater options to
adapt my film that Final Cut did not. I believe that taking on the editing role
was a very tough process as it involved a lot of technicalities and faults that
computers always do, however we resolved these issues by organising our work
more appropriately, this had a great impact on the outcome because we had
finished our trailer within good timing. Becka in-putted her opinion throughout
as she had a good judgement, she ultimately told me everything that should be
included, what not to include, how we could improve our work and what
transitions are most appropriate. I believe Becka and I had worked extremely well to develop the best outcome that we could with the footage we created, we have ultimately put in a good effort to achieve and feel this is demonstrated by the media products we've produced.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






